Liberty Index: Difference between revisions

From IxWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
mNo edit summary
Tag: 2017 source edit
 
(31 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Liberty index is composite of three LoN indexes - the Democracy index, civil rights index, and perceived corruption index. Each is calculated yearly (? maybe no because bloat), with 10 being the highest scoring nation and the benchmark for measurement.
The '''International Liberty Index Foundation''' is a [[League of Nations]]-sanctioned NGO centered on recording and comparing global survey and analytical data to produce comprehensive data for a number of metrics centered around the spread of political freedoms and systems, corruption in governments and societies, social values and norms, and civil rights. Originally founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF originally managed a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Individually, each is scored to a maximum value of 10, the highest of which sets the year's benchmark. Scores for these indices are also available comparatively between years to show the improvement of benchmark-setters year by year. These are typically shown compiled into a single score in the form of the Liberty Index, a {{wp|norm-referenced test|norm-referenced scoring system}} which provides a relative, simple view of a country's overall social and political freedoms.  


something something controversy over biased reporting always an issue, Varshani or someone else raised hell over it, lower nations say it favors Latin-Romance nations and is an attack or so on
Over time, the ILIF has expanded to cover a number of analytical metrics, absorbing several related NGOs such as the Poverty Tracking Organization. As a result, the ILIF published a number of datasets on global GDP and wellbeing metrics which are used by the League of Nations and other international bodies through annual publications.


Burgundie Fiannria Yonderre
Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
 
== Countries by Wealth ==
 
==== GDP ====
 
==== GDPPC ====
 
==== Poverty Rate ====
 
== Countries by Education and Health ==
 
==== Life Expectancy ====
 
==== Mean Years Schooling ====
 
==== Literacy Rate ====
 
==== Population Density ====
 
== Composite Liberty Index ==
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's [[website]].
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Democracy Index by Country
|+Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
!Nation
!Nation
!1960
!1960
Line 12: Line 33:
!1990
!1990
!2000
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2010
!2015
!2015
!2020
!2020
!2025
!Notes
!Notes
|-
|-
|Fiannria
|[[Aciria]]
|
|
|
|
Line 30: Line 51:
|
|
|-
|-
|Yonderre
|[[Algosh Republic|Algoquona]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|2.35
|2.34
|2.34
|4.88
|Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the [[Final War of the Deluge]].
|-
|[[Allaria]]
|
|
|
|
Line 42: Line 75:
|
|
|-
|-
|Cartadania
|[[Alpachnee Confederation|Alpachnee]]
|9.85
|
|9.84
|
|9.46
|9.97
|10.00
|9.93
|9.96
|9.98
|10.00
|
|
|-
|Carna
|9.98
|9.99
|9.94
|10.00
|
|
|10.00
|10.00
|10.00
|9.98
|
|
|-
|Urcea
|10.00
|9.98
|9.97
|
|
|
|
|9.99
|9.93
|9.93
|9.94
|
|
|-
| -
|Kore'hetanua
|8.99
|9.43
|10.00
|9.96
|9.90
|9.93
|9.93
|9.93
|9.92
|
|
|-
|-
|Alstin
|[[Alstin]]
|9.33
|9.33
|9.35
|9.35
Line 96: Line 93:
|9.50
|9.50
|9.68
|9.68
|9.73
|9.87
|9.87
|9.86
|9.86
|9.91
|9.91
|9.92
|
|
|-
|-
|Yytuskia
|[[Anglei]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 111: Line 109:
|
|
|
|
|9.12
|
|
|-
|-
|Burgundie
|[[Anta Carda]]
|7.8
|8.1
|8.5
|8.8
|9.1
|9.1
|9.0
|8.9
|9.1
|N/A
|-
|Etzil
|8.70
|8.73
|8.80
|8.85
|8.84
|8.86
|8.85
|8.85
|8.87
|
|
|-
|Cohe
|
|
|
|
Line 147: Line 121:
|
|
|
|
|8.64
|
|
|-
|-
|Pelaxia
|[[Arcerion]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 159: Line 130:
|
|
|
|
|8.53
|
|
|-
|Prevalia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|8.49
|
|
|-
|-
|Ceylonia
| [[Ashkenang]]
|
| -
|
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|8.54
|
|
|-
|-
|Heku
|[[Battganuur]]
|7.93
|7.95
|8.00
|8.13
|8.02
|8.45
|8.40
|8.33
|8.44
|
|
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|4.30
|
|
|
|
Line 206: Line 155:
|
|
|
|
|6.95
|
|
|8.01
|
|
|-
|-
|Hendalarsk
|[[Bulkh]]
|
|
|
|
Line 219: Line 168:
|
|
|
|
|7.96
|
|
|-
|Galicia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|7.90
|
|
|-
|-
|Tapakdore
|[[Burgundie]]
|
|7.81
|
| 8.19
|
|8.50
|
|8.84
|
|9.12
|
|9.08
|
|8.98
|
|9.17
|7.26
|9.18
|
|
|-
|-
|Kiravia
|[[Caergwynn]]
|
|
|
|
Line 254: Line 191:
|
|
|
|
|
|7.09
|
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|7.02
|
|
|-
|-
|Battganuur
|[[Canpei]]
|
|
|
|
Line 279: Line 204:
|
|
|
|
|6.95
|
|
|-
|Faneria
|4.33
|4.22
|5.67
|6.40
|6.73
|6.92
|6.94
|6.88
|6.91
|
|
|-
|-
|the Cape
|[[Caphiria]]
| -
|7.93
|
|7.95
|8.00
|8.13
|8.02
|8.40
|8.33
|8.44
|
|
|6.38
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
|6.32
|6.01
|6.99
|6.98
|6.73
|Attempted Coup (link or name needed) and reaction caused a noticeable drop in 2020.
|-
|-
|Wealdland
| [[Carna]]
|
|9.98
|
|9.99
|
|9.94
|
|10.00
|
|9.86
|
|10.00
|
| 10.00
|
|9.98
|6.30
|
|
|Consistent top competitor in all categories.
|-
|-
|Peshblwar
|[[Cartadania]]
|
|9.85
|
|9.84
|
|9.46
|
|9.97
|
|10.00
|
|9.96
|
|9.98
|
|10.00
|6.15
|9.99
|
|Consistent top competitor in all categories.
|-
|-
|Umardwal
|[[Ceylonia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 338: Line 251:
|
|
|
|
|8.54
|
|
|6.14
|
|
|-
|-
|Porlos
|[[Chakailan]]
|
|
|
|
|5.88
|5.90
|6.10
|6.05
|5.78
|6.01
|
|-
|Yanuban
|
|
|
|
Line 363: Line 265:
|
|
|
|
|5.50
|
|
|-
|-
|Takatta Loa
|[[Chenango Confederacy|Chenango]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|5.47
|
|
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
|[[Copacaban Republic|Copacaban]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|5.18
|
|
|-
|-
|Kandara
|[[Copake]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|5.09
|
|
|-
|-
|Xingkai'pei
|[[Corcra]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.70
|
|
|-
|Istrenya
|
|
|
|
Line 423: Line 313:
|
|
|
|
|4.70
|
|
|-
|-
|Pursat
|[[Daxia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 434: Line 323:
|
|
|
|
|
|3.94
|4.68
|3.91
|
|
|-
|-
|Dhavastu
|[[Duōmachāha]]
|
|4.23
|
|5.02
|
|4.89
|
|
|
|
|
|4.67
|4.67
|
|5.81
| 5.83
|5.96
|6.12
|5.93
|The Duama Sovereign Socialist Republics was replaced by the People's Republic of Duōmachāha in 1994.
|-
|-
|Ehemo
|[[Ehemo]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|
|
Line 460: Line 348:
|
|
|4.28
|4.28
|
|-
|Shingtu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|4.12
|
|
|-
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|[[Eldmora-Regulus]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.99
|
|-
|Corumm
|
|
|
|
Line 495: Line 361:
|
|
|
|
|3.94
|
|
|-
|-
|Jalqolak
| [[Etzil]]
|8.70
|8.73
|8.80
|8.85
|8.84
|8.85
|8.85
|8.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.77
|
|
|-
|-
|Kelekona
|[[Faneria]]
|
|4.33
|
|4.22
|
|5.67
|
|6.40
|
|6.73
|
|6.94
|
| 6.88
|
|6.91
|3.39
|7.03
|
|Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization.
|-
|Sabnaki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|3.31
|
|-
|-
|Zaclaria
|[[Fiannria]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.66
|
|-
|Kulaparkar
|
|
|
|
Line 555: Line 397:
|
|
|
|
|2.52
|
|
|-
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|[[Grajnidar]]
|?
|?
|?
|?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.34
|
|-
|Iriquona
|
|
|
|
Line 577: Line 409:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.16
|
|
|-
|-
|Pankara
|[[Hendalarsk]]
|
|
|
|
Line 590: Line 419:
|
|
|
|
|7.96
|
|
|1.88
|
|
|-
|-
|Varshan
|[[Hollona and Diorisia]]
|2.13
|2.01
|3.46
|2.49
|2.45
|0.76
|1.27
|1.38
|1.36
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
Line 615: Line 433:
|
|
|
|
|1.15
|
|
|}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Civil Rights Index by Country
!Nation
!1960
!1970
!1980
!1990
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2015
!2020
!Notes
|-
|-
|Burgundie
|[[Netansett]]
|6.8
| -
|7.5
| -
|8.1
| -
|8.4
| -
|8.8
|4.33
|9.1
|2.04
|8.7
|2.10
|8.9
|2.16
|9.2
|N/A
|-
|Fiannria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
|-
|-
|Yonderre
| [[Istrenya]]
|
|
|
|
Line 668: Line 459:
|
|
|-
|-
|Cartadania
|[[Kandara]]
|
|
|
|
Line 680: Line 471:
|
|
|-
|-
|Carna
|[[Kartejya]]
|
|
|
|
Line 692: Line 483:
|
|
|-
|-
|Urcea
|[[Kiravia]]
|
|?
|
|3.43
|
|3.92
|
|3.89
|
|[[Kirosocialism|3.86]]
|
|6.91
|
|7.12
|
|7.09
|
|7.18
|
|
|-
|-
|Kore'hetanua
|[[Kronesia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 716: Line 507:
|
|
|-
|-
|Alstin
|[[Loresia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 728: Line 519:
|
|
|-
|-
|Yytuskia
|[[Malentina]]
|
|
|
|
Line 740: Line 531:
|
|
|-
|-
|Etzil
|[[Maloka]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Cohe
|[[Metzetta]]
|
|
|
|
Line 764: Line 555:
|
|
|-
|-
|Pelaxia
|[[New Archduchy]]
|
|
|
|
Line 776: Line 567:
|
|
|-
|-
|Prevalia
|[[New Veltorina]]
|
|
|
|
Line 788: Line 579:
|
|
|-
|-
|Ceylonia
|[[New Harren]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 798: Line 587:
|
|
|
|
|2.68
|7.88
|
|
|-
|-
|Heku
|[[Orclenia]]
|
|
|
|
Line 812: Line 603:
|
|
|-
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|[[Oyashima]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 823: Line 611:
|
|
|
|
|6.78
|3.65
|In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities.
|-
|-
|Hendalarsk
|[[Pankara]]
|
| -
|
| -
|
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|(1.88)
| -
|Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019.
|-
|-
|Galicia
|[[Paulastra]]
|
|
|
|
Line 848: Line 639:
|
|
|-
|-
|Tapakdore
|[[Pelaxia]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 857: Line 647:
|
|
|
|
|8.53
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Kiravia
|[[Peshabiwar]]
|
|
|
|
Line 872: Line 663:
|
|
|-
|-
|Wonjin
|[[Porlos]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|5.88
|5.90
|6.05
|5.78
|6.01
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|the Cape
|[[Pukhgundi]]
|
|
|
|
Line 896: Line 687:
|
|
|-
|-
|Battganuur
|[[Pursat]]
|
|
|
|
Line 908: Line 699:
|
|
|-
|-
|Faneria
|[[Quetzenkel]]
|
|
|
|
Line 920: Line 711:
|
|
|-
|-
|Wealdland
|[[Rusana]]
|
|
|
|
Line 932: Line 723:
|
|
|-
|-
|Peshblwar
|[[Sabnaki]]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|2.98
|3.10
|3.21
|3.30
|3.32
|3.31
|4.83
|Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers.
|-
|-
|Umardwal
|[[Stenza]]
|
|
|
|
Line 956: Line 747:
|
|
|-
|-
|Porlos
|[[Loa Republic]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 965: Line 755:
|
|
|
|
|5.47
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Yanuban
|[[Lariana]]
|
|
|
|
Line 980: Line 771:
|
|
|-
|-
|Takatta Loa
|[[Tapakdore]]
|
|
|
|
|
Line 989: Line 779:
|
|
|
|
|7.26
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
|[[Telokona]]
|
|
|
|
Line 1,004: Line 795:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kandara
|[[Telonaticolan]]
|
|
|
|
Line 1,016: Line 807:
|
|
|-
|-
|Xingkai'pei
|[[the Cape]]
|
|5.68
|
|5.64
|
|[[1982 Republic Day revolution|4.03]]
|
|6.38
|
|6.32
|
|6.99
|
|6.98
|
|[[2020 Cape Coup|6.33]]
|
|6.73
|
|Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status.
|-
|Istrenya
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pursat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Dhavastu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Ehemo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Shingtu
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Corumm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Jalqolak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kelekona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Sabnaki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Zaclaria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kulaparkar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Iriquona
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pankara
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|}
{| class="wikitable sortable mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
|+Perceived Freedom from Corruption Index by Country
!Nation
!1960
!1970
!1980
!1990
!2000
!2005
!2010
!2015
!2020
!Notes
|-
|Burgundie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Fiannria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yonderre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Cartadania
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Carna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Urcea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kore'hetanua
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Alstin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yytuskia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Etzil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Cohe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pelaxia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Prevalia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Ceylonia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Heku
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pukhtunkhwa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Hendalarsk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Galicia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Tapakdore
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Kiravia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Wonjin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|the Cape
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Battganuur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Faneria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Wealdland
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Peshblwar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Umardwal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Porlos
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Yanuban
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Takatta Loa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|-
|Titechaxha
|Titechaxha
Line 1,606: Line 831:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kandara
|UAE
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,617: Line 841:
|
|
|
|
|Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy.
|-
|-
|Xingkai'pei
|[[Umardwal]]
|
|
|
|
Line 1,630: Line 855:
|
|
|-
|-
|Istrenya
|[[Urcea]]
|
|10.00
|
|9.98
|
|9.97
|
|9.85
|
|9.87
|
|9.93
|
|9.93
|
|9.94
|
|
|
|Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed.
|-
|-
|Pursat
|[[Varshan]]
|
|2.13
|
|2.01
|
|3.46
|
|2.49
|
|[[Xichi Crackdowns|0.76]]
|
|1.27
|
|1.38
|
|1.36
|
|1.98
|
|Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the [[Final War of the Deluge]] shows promise for improvements.
|-
|-
|Dhavastu
|Verecundia
|
|
|
|
Line 1,666: Line 891:
|
|
|-
|-
|Ehemo
|Vinesia
|
|
|
|
Line 1,678: Line 903:
|
|
|-
|-
|Shingtu
|[[Vithinja]]
|
|3.91
|
|4.78
|
|4.22
|
|5.42
|
|6.67
|
|6.12
|
|6.22
|
|6.77
|
|6.93
|
|
|-
|-
|West Bussdaberria
|Volonia
|
|
|
|
Line 1,702: Line 927:
|
|
|-
|-
|Corumm
|Vorenia
|
|
|
|
Line 1,714: Line 939:
|
|
|-
|-
|Jalqolak
|Washakara
|
|
|
|
Line 1,726: Line 951:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kelekona
|[[Whiteglen]]
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,737: Line 958:
|
|
|
|
|-
|Sabnaki
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|1.76
|2.01
|2.11
|-
|-
|Zaclaria
| [[Yanuban]]
|
|
|
|
Line 1,762: Line 975:
|
|
|-
|-
|Kulaparkar
|[[Yonderre]]
|
|8.05
|
|7.98
|
|8.03
|
|8.20
|
|8.30
|
| 8.36
|
|8.40
|
|8.42
|
| 8.45
|
|
|-
|-
|Algoquona/Algosh Republic
| [[Zaclaria]]
| -
| -
| -
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Iriquona
| -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|Pankara
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|-
|East Bussdaberria
|
|
|
|
|
Line 1,819: Line 995:
|
|
|
|
|2.66
|
|
|
|
|}
|}
==History==
==Controversies==
The Liberty Index and other scoring metrics used by the ILIF have often been criticized as unduly favoring Occidental and Coscivian cultures over Alshari, Cronan, and Audonian nations, as well as opposing arguments from liberal nations decrying the institution of supposedly artificially inflating the scores of constitutional monarchies. In some cases, these arguments go so far as to suggest that the ILIF is little but a propaganda front for League donor nations.
In 2002, [[Varshan]] attempted unsuccessfully to sue the ILIF into in League courts on a number of accusations amounting to vexatious litigation. Several of these cases remained in limbo until Varshan's expulsion from the League of Nations.
[[Category:Bureau of International Statistics]]
[[Category:IXWB]]
[[Category:League of Nations]]

Latest revision as of 15:00, 16 March 2024

The International Liberty Index Foundation is a League of Nations-sanctioned NGO centered on recording and comparing global survey and analytical data to produce comprehensive data for a number of metrics centered around the spread of political freedoms and systems, corruption in governments and societies, social values and norms, and civil rights. Originally founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF originally managed a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Individually, each is scored to a maximum value of 10, the highest of which sets the year's benchmark. Scores for these indices are also available comparatively between years to show the improvement of benchmark-setters year by year. These are typically shown compiled into a single score in the form of the Liberty Index, a norm-referenced scoring system which provides a relative, simple view of a country's overall social and political freedoms.

Over time, the ILIF has expanded to cover a number of analytical metrics, absorbing several related NGOs such as the Poverty Tracking Organization. As a result, the ILIF published a number of datasets on global GDP and wellbeing metrics which are used by the League of Nations and other international bodies through annual publications.

Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.

Countries by Wealth

GDP

GDPPC

Poverty Rate

Countries by Education and Health

Life Expectancy

Mean Years Schooling

Literacy Rate

Population Density

Composite Liberty Index

Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's website.

Composite Liberty Index Scores by Country (Quinquennial)
Nation 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2015 2020 2025 Notes
Aciria
Algoquona - - - - - 2.35 2.34 2.34 4.88 Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the Final War of the Deluge.
Allaria
Alpachnee -
Alstin 9.33 9.35 9.46 9.50 9.68 9.87 9.86 9.91 9.92
Anglei
Anta Carda
Arcerion
Ashkenang - - - - - - - -
Battganuur 6.95
Bulkh
Burgundie 7.81 8.19 8.50 8.84 9.12 9.08 8.98 9.17 9.18
Caergwynn
Canpei
Caphiria 7.93 7.95 8.00 8.13 8.02 8.40 8.33 8.44 Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories.
Carna 9.98 9.99 9.94 10.00 9.86 10.00 10.00 9.98 Consistent top competitor in all categories.
Cartadania 9.85 9.84 9.46 9.97 10.00 9.96 9.98 10.00 9.99 Consistent top competitor in all categories.
Ceylonia 8.54
Chakailan
Chenango - - - - - - - -
Copacaban - - - - - - - -
Copake - - - - - - - -
Corcra
Daxia 3.94 3.91
Duōmachāha 4.23 5.02 4.89 4.67 5.81 5.83 5.96 6.12 5.93 The Duama Sovereign Socialist Republics was replaced by the People's Republic of Duōmachāha in 1994.
Ehemo 4.12 4.28
Eldmora-Regulus
Etzil 8.70 8.73 8.80 8.85 8.84 8.85 8.85 8.87
Faneria 4.33 4.22 5.67 6.40 6.73 6.94 6.88 6.91 7.03 Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization.
Fiannria
Grajnidar
Hendalarsk 7.96
Hollona and Diorisia
Netansett - - - - 4.33 2.04 2.10 2.16 Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement.
Istrenya
Kandara
Kartejya
Kiravia ? 3.43 3.92 3.89 3.86 6.91 7.12 7.09 7.18
Kronesia
Loresia
Malentina
Maloka - - - - - - - -
Metzetta
New Archduchy
New Veltorina
New Harren 2.68 7.88
Orclenia
Oyashima 6.78 3.65 In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities.
Pankara - - - (1.88) - Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019.
Paulastra
Pelaxia 8.53
Peshabiwar
Porlos 5.88 5.90 6.05 5.78 6.01
Pukhgundi
Pursat
Quetzenkel
Rusana
Sabnaki 2.98 3.10 3.21 3.30 3.32 3.31 4.83 Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers.
Stenza
Loa Republic 5.47
Lariana
Tapakdore 7.26
Telokona
Telonaticolan
the Cape 5.68 5.64 4.03 6.38 6.32 6.99 6.98 6.33 6.73 Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status.
Titechaxha
UAE Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy.
Umardwal
Urcea 10.00 9.98 9.97 9.85 9.87 9.93 9.93 9.94 Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed.
Varshan 2.13 2.01 3.46 2.49 0.76 1.27 1.38 1.36 1.98 Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the Final War of the Deluge shows promise for improvements.
Verecundia
Vinesia
Vithinja 3.91 4.78 4.22 5.42 6.67 6.12 6.22 6.77 6.93
Volonia
Vorenia
Washakara
Whiteglen
Yanuban
Yonderre 8.05 7.98 8.03 8.20 8.30 8.36 8.40 8.42 8.45
Zaclaria 2.66

History

Controversies

The Liberty Index and other scoring metrics used by the ILIF have often been criticized as unduly favoring Occidental and Coscivian cultures over Alshari, Cronan, and Audonian nations, as well as opposing arguments from liberal nations decrying the institution of supposedly artificially inflating the scores of constitutional monarchies. In some cases, these arguments go so far as to suggest that the ILIF is little but a propaganda front for League donor nations.

In 2002, Varshan attempted unsuccessfully to sue the ILIF into in League courts on a number of accusations amounting to vexatious litigation. Several of these cases remained in limbo until Varshan's expulsion from the League of Nations.

Retrieved from "https://ixwiki.com/index.php?title=Liberty_Index&oldid=72313"