Liberty Index: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Burgundie | |[[Burgundie]] | ||
|7.81 | |7.81 | ||
|8.19 | |8.19 | ||
| Line 160: | Line 160: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Caergwynn | |[[Caergwynn]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 172: | Line 172: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Canpei | |[[Canpei]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 184: | Line 184: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Caphiria | |[[Caphiria]] | ||
|7.93 | |7.93 | ||
|7.95 | |7.95 | ||
| Line 196: | Line 196: | ||
|Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | |Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Carna | |[[Carna]] | ||
|9.98 | |9.98 | ||
|9.99 | |9.99 | ||
| Line 208: | Line 208: | ||
|Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |Consistent top competitor in all categories. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Cartadania | |[[Cartadania]] | ||
|9.85 | |9.85 | ||
|9.84 | |9.84 | ||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
|Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |Consistent top competitor in all categories. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ceylonia | |[[Ceylonia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Chakailan | |[[Chakailan]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 244: | Line 244: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Chenango | |[[Chenango Confederacy|Chenango]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 256: | Line 256: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Copacaban | |[[Copacaban Republic|Copacaban]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 268: | Line 268: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Copake | |[[Copake]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 280: | Line 280: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Corcra | |[[Corcra]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 292: | Line 292: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Corumm | |[[Corumm]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Duōmachāha]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 316: | Line 316: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Ehemo | |[[Ehemo]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 328: | Line 328: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Eldmora-Regulus | |[[Eldmora-Regulus]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 340: | Line 340: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Etzil | |[[Etzil]] | ||
|8.70 | |8.70 | ||
|8.73 | |8.73 | ||
| Line 352: | Line 352: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Faneria | |[[Faneria]] | ||
|4.33 | |4.33 | ||
|4.22 | |4.22 | ||
| Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
|Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. | |Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Fiannria | |[[Fiannria]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 376: | Line 376: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Grajnidar | |[[Grajnidar]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 388: | Line 388: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Hendalarsk | |[[Hendalarsk]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 400: | Line 400: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Hollona and Diorisia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 412: | Line 412: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Iriquona | |[[Iriquona]] | ||
| - | | - | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 424: | Line 424: | ||
|Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | |Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Istrenya | |[[Istrenya]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 436: | Line 436: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Kandara | |[[Kandara]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 448: | Line 448: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Kartejya | |[[Kartejya]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 460: | Line 460: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Kiravia | |[[Kiravia]] | ||
|? | |? | ||
|3.43 | |3.43 | ||
| Line 472: | Line 472: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Kloistan | |[[Kloistan]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 484: | Line 484: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Kronesia | |[[Kronesia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Loresia | |[[Loresia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 508: | Line 508: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Lutsana | |[[Lutsana]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Malentina | |[[Malentina]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 532: | Line 532: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Maloka | |[[Maloka]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 544: | Line 544: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Metzetta | |[[Metzetta]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 556: | Line 556: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|New Archduchy | |[[New Archduchy]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 568: | Line 568: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|New Veltorina | |[[New Veltorina]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 580: | Line 580: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|New | |[[New Yustona]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 592: | Line 592: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Orclenia | |[[Orclenia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 604: | Line 604: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Oyashima | |[[Oyashima]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 616: | Line 616: | ||
|In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | |In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pankara | |[[Pankara]] | ||
| - | | - | ||
| - | | - | ||
| Line 628: | Line 628: | ||
|Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | |Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| | |[[Paulastra]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 640: | Line 640: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pelaxia | |[[Pelaxia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 652: | Line 652: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Peshabiwar | |[[Peshabiwar]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 664: | Line 664: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Porlos | |[[Porlos]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 676: | Line 676: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pukhgundi | |[[Pukhgundi]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 688: | Line 688: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Pursat | |[[Pursat]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 700: | Line 700: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Quetzenkel | |[[Quetzenkel]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 712: | Line 712: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Rusana | |[[Rusana]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 724: | Line 724: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Sabnaki | |[[Sabnaki]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 736: | Line 736: | ||
|Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | |Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Stenza | |[[Stenza]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 748: | Line 748: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Takatta Loa | |[[Takatta Loa]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 760: | Line 760: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Talionia | |[[Talionia]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 772: | Line 772: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Tanhai | |[[Tanhai]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 784: | Line 784: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Tapakdore | |[[Tapakdore]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 796: | Line 796: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Telokona | |[[Telokona]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 808: | Line 808: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Telonaticolan | |[[Telonaticolan]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 820: | Line 820: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|the Cape | |[[the Cape]] | ||
|5.68 | |5.68 | ||
|5.64 | |5.64 | ||
| Line 856: | Line 856: | ||
|Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | |Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Umardwal | |[[Umardwal]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 868: | Line 868: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Urcea | |[[Urcea]] | ||
|10.00 | |10.00 | ||
|9.98 | |9.98 | ||
| Line 880: | Line 880: | ||
|Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | |Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Varshan | |[[Varshan]] | ||
|2.13 | |2.13 | ||
|2.01 | |2.01 | ||
| Line 916: | Line 916: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Vithinja | |[[Vithinja]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 964: | Line 964: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Whiteglen | |[[Whiteglen]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 976: | Line 976: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Yanuban | |[[Yanuban]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| Line 1,000: | Line 1,000: | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Zaclaria | |[[Zaclaria]] | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 16:14, 8 May 2022
The International Liberty Index Foundation is a League of Nations-sanctioned NGO whose goal is the cataloguing of the nations of the world by their traits in relation to democratic norms and liberal values. Founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF manages a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's website.
| Nation | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aciria | ||||||||||
| Algoquona | - | - | - | - | - | 2.35 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 4.88 | Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the Final War of the Deluge. |
| Allaria | ||||||||||
| Alpachnee | ||||||||||
| Alstin | 9.33 | 9.35 | 9.46 | 9.50 | 9.68 | 9.87 | 9.86 | 9.91 | 9.92 | |
| Anglei | ||||||||||
| Anta Carda | ||||||||||
| Arcerion | ||||||||||
| Ashkenang | ||||||||||
| Battganuur | 6.95 | |||||||||
| Bulkh | ||||||||||
| Burgundie | 7.81 | 8.19 | 8.50 | 8.84 | 9.12 | 9.08 | 8.98 | 9.17 | 9.18 | |
| Caergwynn | ||||||||||
| Canpei | ||||||||||
| Caphiria | 7.93 | 7.95 | 8.00 | 8.13 | 8.02 | 8.40 | 8.33 | 8.44 | Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | |
| Carna | 9.98 | 9.99 | 9.94 | 10.00 | 9.86 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 9.98 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |
| Cartadania | 9.85 | 9.84 | 9.46 | 9.97 | 10.00 | 9.96 | 9.98 | 10.00 | 9.99 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. |
| Ceylonia | 8.54 | |||||||||
| Chakailan | ||||||||||
| Chenango | ||||||||||
| Copacaban | ||||||||||
| Copake | ||||||||||
| Corcra | ||||||||||
| Corumm | 3.94 | 3.91 | ||||||||
| Duōmachāha | ||||||||||
| Ehemo | 4.12 | 4.28 | ||||||||
| Eldmora-Regulus | ||||||||||
| Etzil | 8.70 | 8.73 | 8.80 | 8.85 | 8.84 | 8.85 | 8.85 | 8.87 | ||
| Faneria | 4.33 | 4.22 | 5.67 | 6.40 | 6.73 | 6.94 | 6.88 | 6.91 | 7.03 | Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. |
| Fiannria | ||||||||||
| Grajnidar | ||||||||||
| Hendalarsk | 7.96 | |||||||||
| Hollona and Diorisia | ||||||||||
| Iriquona | - | - | - | - | 4.33 | 2.04 | 2.10 | 2.16 | Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | |
| Istrenya | ||||||||||
| Kandara | ||||||||||
| Kartejya | ||||||||||
| Kiravia | ? | 3.43 | 3.92 | 3.89 | 3.86 | 6.91 | 7.12 | 7.09 | 7.18 | |
| Kloistan | ||||||||||
| Kronesia | ||||||||||
| Loresia | ||||||||||
| Lutsana | ||||||||||
| Malentina | ||||||||||
| Maloka | ||||||||||
| Metzetta | ||||||||||
| New Archduchy | ||||||||||
| New Veltorina | ||||||||||
| New Yustona | 2.68 | 7.88 | ||||||||
| Orclenia | ||||||||||
| Oyashima | 6.78 | 3.65 | In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | |||||||
| Pankara | - | - | - | (1.88) | - | Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | ||||
| Paulastra | ||||||||||
| Pelaxia | 8.53 | |||||||||
| Peshabiwar | ||||||||||
| Porlos | 5.88 | 5.90 | 6.05 | 5.78 | 6.01 | |||||
| Pukhgundi | ||||||||||
| Pursat | ||||||||||
| Quetzenkel | ||||||||||
| Rusana | ||||||||||
| Sabnaki | 2.98 | 3.10 | 3.21 | 3.30 | 3.32 | 3.31 | 4.83 | Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | ||
| Stenza | ||||||||||
| Takatta Loa | 5.47 | |||||||||
| Talionia | ||||||||||
| Tanhai | ||||||||||
| Tapakdore | 7.26 | |||||||||
| Telokona | ||||||||||
| Telonaticolan | ||||||||||
| the Cape | 5.68 | 5.64 | 4.03 | 6.38 | 6.32 | 6.99 | 6.98 | 6.33 | 6.73 | Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. |
| Titechaxha | ||||||||||
| UAE | Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | |||||||||
| Umardwal | ||||||||||
| Urcea | 10.00 | 9.98 | 9.97 | 9.85 | 9.87 | 9.93 | 9.93 | 9.94 | Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | |
| Varshan | 2.13 | 2.01 | 3.46 | 2.49 | 0.76 | 1.27 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.98 | Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the Final War of the Deluge shows promise for improvements. |
| Verecundia | ||||||||||
| Vinesia | ||||||||||
| Vithinja | ||||||||||
| Volonia | ||||||||||
| Vorenia | ||||||||||
| Washakara | ||||||||||
| Whiteglen | ||||||||||
| Yanuban | ||||||||||
| Yonderre | 8.05 | 7.98 | 8.03 | 8.20 | 8.30 | 8.36 | 8.40 | 8.42 | 8.45 | |
| Zaclaria | 2.66 |
History
Controversies
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the ILIF of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly boosting the scores of constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of Carna in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.