Liberty Index: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 482: | Line 482: | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
| | |[[Union of Kloi Socialist Republics]] replaced by [[Kloinarian Federation]] in 1993. | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Kronesia]] | |[[Kronesia]] | ||
| Line 533: | Line 533: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[[Maloka]] | |[[Maloka]] | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | - | ||
| | | | ||
| | | | ||
Revision as of 18:02, 9 May 2022
The International Liberty Index Foundation is a League of Nations-sanctioned NGO whose goal is the cataloguing of the nations of the world by their traits in relation to democratic norms and liberal values. Founded in 1958 in Cartadania in conjunction with the Organization for Democracy International, the ILIF manages a League-sanctioned set of indexes: the the Democracy Index, the Civil Rights Index, and the Perceived Corruption Index. Each is calculated relative to the global community yearly, with one nation scoring a 10 and setting the benchmark for the year. In addition, the ILIF manages a Global Liberty Index marking fluctuations in the quality of Index Benchmark Nations as well as a Composite Index.
Aggregate scores from each decade since 1960 and every five years since 2010 are shown below, and scores as well as individual indexes can be viewed in full on the International Liberty Index Foundation's website.
| Nation | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990 | 2000 | 2010 | 2015 | 2020 | 2025 | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aciria | ||||||||||
| Algoquona | - | - | - | - | - | 2.35 | 2.34 | 2.34 | 4.88 | Algoquona was subject to regime change in 2025 as part of the Final War of the Deluge. |
| Allaria | ||||||||||
| Alpachnee | - | |||||||||
| Alstin | 9.33 | 9.35 | 9.46 | 9.50 | 9.68 | 9.87 | 9.86 | 9.91 | 9.92 | |
| Anglei | ||||||||||
| Anta Carda | ||||||||||
| Arcerion | ||||||||||
| Ashkenang | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Battganuur | 6.95 | |||||||||
| Bulkh | ||||||||||
| Burgundie | 7.81 | 8.19 | 8.50 | 8.84 | 9.12 | 9.08 | 8.98 | 9.17 | 9.18 | |
| Caergwynn | ||||||||||
| Canpei | ||||||||||
| Caphiria | 7.93 | 7.95 | 8.00 | 8.13 | 8.02 | 8.40 | 8.33 | 8.44 | Scores extremely well in perceived corruption index and mediocre in other categories. | |
| Carna | 9.98 | 9.99 | 9.94 | 10.00 | 9.86 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 9.98 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. | |
| Cartadania | 9.85 | 9.84 | 9.46 | 9.97 | 10.00 | 9.96 | 9.98 | 10.00 | 9.99 | Consistent top competitor in all categories. |
| Ceylonia | 8.54 | |||||||||
| Chakailan | ||||||||||
| Chenango | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Copacaban | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Copake | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Corcra | ||||||||||
| Corumm | 3.94 | 3.91 | ||||||||
| Duōmachāha | 4.23 | 5.02 | 4.89 | 4.67 | 5.81 | 5.83 | 5.96 | 6.12 | 5.93 | The Duama Sovereign Socialist Republics was replaced by the People's Republic of Duōmachāha in 1994. |
| Ehemo | 4.12 | 4.28 | ||||||||
| Eldmora-Regulus | ||||||||||
| Etzil | 8.70 | 8.73 | 8.80 | 8.85 | 8.84 | 8.85 | 8.85 | 8.87 | ||
| Faneria | 4.33 | 4.22 | 5.67 | 6.40 | 6.73 | 6.94 | 6.88 | 6.91 | 7.03 | Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. Score rising due to increasing liberalization. |
| Fiannria | ||||||||||
| Grajnidar | ||||||||||
| Hendalarsk | 7.96 | |||||||||
| Hollona and Diorisia | ||||||||||
| Iriquona | - | - | - | - | 4.33 | 2.04 | 2.10 | 2.16 | Composite score reduced by arbitrary court system and lack of enfranchisement. | |
| Istrenya | ||||||||||
| Kandara | ||||||||||
| Kartejya | ||||||||||
| Kiravia | ? | 3.43 | 3.92 | 3.89 | 3.86 | 6.91 | 7.12 | 7.09 | 7.18 | |
| Kloistan | Union of Kloi Socialist Republics replaced by Kloinarian Federation in 1993. | |||||||||
| Kronesia | ||||||||||
| Loresia | ||||||||||
| Lutsana | ||||||||||
| Malentina | ||||||||||
| Maloka | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| Metzetta | ||||||||||
| New Archduchy | ||||||||||
| New Veltorina | ||||||||||
| New Yustona | 2.68 | 7.88 | ||||||||
| Orclenia | ||||||||||
| Oyashima | 6.78 | 3.65 | In 2022, Oyashima's government suffered a coup related to civil infighting between the Danehong and Mutsutorine ethnicities. | |||||||
| Pankara | - | - | - | (1.88) | - | Pankara has made efforts to prevent accurate Index reporting since 2019. | ||||
| Paulastra | ||||||||||
| Pelaxia | 8.53 | |||||||||
| Peshabiwar | ||||||||||
| Porlos | 5.88 | 5.90 | 6.05 | 5.78 | 6.01 | |||||
| Pukhgundi | ||||||||||
| Pursat | ||||||||||
| Quetzenkel | ||||||||||
| Rusana | ||||||||||
| Sabnaki | 2.98 | 3.10 | 3.21 | 3.30 | 3.32 | 3.31 | 4.83 | Beginning in 2024, Sabnaki began a liberalization campaign as part of a rapprochement with Occidental powers. | ||
| Stenza | ||||||||||
| Takatta Loa | 5.47 | |||||||||
| Talionia | ||||||||||
| Tanhai | ||||||||||
| Tapakdore | 7.26 | |||||||||
| Telokona | ||||||||||
| Telonaticolan | ||||||||||
| the Cape | 5.68 | 5.64 | 4.03 | 6.38 | 6.32 | 6.99 | 6.98 | 6.33 | 6.73 | Attempted coup caused a noticeable drop in 2020. Composite score reduced by effective one-party state status. |
| Titechaxha | ||||||||||
| UAE | Composite score reduced by status as a hereditary absolute monarchy. | |||||||||
| Umardwal | ||||||||||
| Urcea | 10.00 | 9.98 | 9.97 | 9.85 | 9.87 | 9.93 | 9.93 | 9.94 | Extremely good scoring in corruption and democracy indexes as a constitutional monarchy. High scores in civil rights are disputed. | |
| Varshan | 2.13 | 2.01 | 3.46 | 2.49 | 0.76 | 1.27 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.98 | Consistent low scores in all categories; 2025 defeat in the Final War of the Deluge shows promise for improvements. |
| Verecundia | ||||||||||
| Vinesia | ||||||||||
| Vithinja | ||||||||||
| Volonia | ||||||||||
| Vorenia | ||||||||||
| Washakara | ||||||||||
| Whiteglen | ||||||||||
| Yanuban | ||||||||||
| Yonderre | 8.05 | 7.98 | 8.03 | 8.20 | 8.30 | 8.36 | 8.40 | 8.42 | 8.45 | |
| Zaclaria | 2.66 |
History
Controversies
The Liberty Index has a long history of dispute, mainly by nations with lower scores or non-Ocidental or Coscivian culture nations. Criticisms of the Liberty Index often center of accusing the ILIF of being biased towards Latin and Romance nations, unfairly boosting the scores of constitutional monarchies where the monarch retains real powers of government, and occasionally going as far as suggesting the Liberty Index is biased towards donor nations. Counterclaims often point to the inclusion of Carna in the upper echelons of scoring listings, as well as the fact that non-Latins can suck it.