Animal rights by country: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hendalarsk (talk | contribs) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
|{{yes}} | |{{yes}} | ||
|{{yes}} | |{{yes}} | ||
|{{yes}} | |||
|- | |||
|{{flag|Corumm}} | |||
| {{no}} | |||
|{{yes}} | |||
|{{no}} | |||
|{{yes}} | |{{yes}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Line 144: | Line 150: | ||
|{{no X|}} | |{{no X|}} | ||
| | | | ||
|- | |||
|{{flag|Corumm}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{no X|}} | |||
|{{no X|}} | |||
|{{no X|}} | |||
|{{no X|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|{{yes C|}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{flag|Eldmora-Regulus}} | |{{flag|Eldmora-Regulus}} | ||
Revision as of 06:53, 26 March 2022
Rights affecting non-human animals, commonly called 'animal rights', encompass everything from the legal recognition of non-human animal sentience to the absolute lack of any anti-cruelty laws with no regard for animal welfare. The recognition of such animal rights varies greatly from one jurisdiction (such as a country, territory, or other political entity) to another.
It has been proposed that the League of Nations pass the first resolution recognizing animal rights, the Universal Declaration on Animal Welfare, which acknowledges the importance of the sentience of animals and human responsibilities towards them.
Overview
| Country/territory | Recognition of animal sentience | Recognition of animal suffering | Anti-cruelty laws meet OIE standards | Laws against animal cruelty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Burgundie
|
No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Caphiria
|
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Carna
|
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Corumm
|
No | Yes | No | Yes |
 Eldmora-Regulus
|
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Faneria
|
No | Yes | No | Yes |
 Hendalarsk
|
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Takatta Loa
|
Varies | Varies | No | Varies |
 Urcea
|
No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
 Vithinja
|
Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Global animal rights
 |
Permitted |
|
Permitted, with complex legality or practice |
 |
Varies by subdivision |
 |
Prohibited, with complex legality or practice |
|
Prohibited |
| Country/territory | Battery cages | Beak trimming | Chick culling | Foie gras production | Stunning animals during ritual slaughter |
Whaling | Cosmetic
animal testing |
Bullfighting | Cockfighting | Dog fighting | Dolphinariums/ marine mammal captivity | Use of animals in circuses | Goose pulling | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Burgundie
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foie gras is delicious. Whaling is a cultural pillar of Burgundie. Cosmetic testing on animals is science. Marine mammal captivity is regulated to board certified aquariums. Goose pulling is only done to dead or rubber geese. |
| Caphiria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bullfighting, using animals and circuses, and marine mammal captivity are illegal on a broad level, although it is possible through strict regulations. Whaling is illegal but it is possible to obtain a commercial whaling license. |
| Carna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Corumm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Eldmora-Regulus
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Faneria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hendalarsk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Takatta Loa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Although Takatta Loa's lack of animal welfare laws is considered among the worst in the world, special care is afforded to insects and other arthropods due to religious beliefs. As a result, there is a great deal of legislation enshrining the rights of arthropods, which in some cases are more advanced than the rights afforded to Loa citizens. |
| Urcea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Many animal welfare issues are handled at the provincial level, but a consensus exists on most issues. |
| Vithinja
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|